Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves animal hospital special use, slope/tree permits and other routine decisions
Summary
At its Feb. 18 meeting, the Greenburgh Planning Board approved a draft decision for the Central Animal Hospital special‑use permit (with stormwater and landscaping conditions), granted draft steep‑slope and tree‑removal permits for Clemmer (with stormwater confirmation), and approved minutes and other routine procedural items by unanimous voice votes.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Greenburgh Planning Board on Feb. 18 approved several draft decisions and routine actions, including a special‑use permit for a small animal hospital and draft decisions for steep‑slope and tree‑removal permits.
Town planner Britton reviewed site‑specific conditions for the Central Animal Hospital special‑use permit, highlighting a condition requiring the applicant or property owner to inspect and repair stormwater management facilities as needed (subject to town‑engineer review) and another condition requiring enhanced native front‑yard plantings to the satisfaction of the town forestry officer. The board classified the project as a Type II action under SEQRA and approved the draft decision by motion and voice vote.
For case PB2517 (Clemmer), staff described two key conditions: a historic‑resource referral step because a proposed garage slated for demolition appears to be more than 50 years old, and a stormwater requirement directing the town engineer to confirm the applicant's stormwater system is designed to handle a 50‑year storm event. The board classified the action as Type II under SEQRA and, following discussion, approved the draft steep‑slope and tree‑removal decisions.
Other routine items on the agenda included approval of the Feb. 4 minutes and the chair's handling of certain administrative matters. All motions on these items passed by voice vote; no member recorded a dissent on the public record.
Why it matters: The approvals move several small‑scale land‑use matters forward while attaching site‑specific environmental protections (stormwater confirmation, native plantings, and historic‑resource coordination) that will be conditions of permit issuance.
