Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Pleasanton council on transparency as proposed pay resolution fails
Summary
Residents raised concerns about transparency, hiring and executive sessions and several speakers urged approval of a proposed pay resolution; a motion to adopt Resolution 473 died for lack of a second and the measure did not pass.
Several Pleasanton residents used the public-comment period April 20 to press the council on transparency and proposed increases to council pay.
Rebecca Bates, of 102 E 9th Street, told the council she received a water bill in the mail after the due date and said she had already contacted the post office; City Administrator Becky Hegwald offered to email Bates a copy of the bill on the mailing date. Aaron Portmann (208 E 14th Street) raised broader concerns about transparency in council hiring, executive sessions and the level of departmental involvement in meetings.
David Schuermann (603 W 15th Street) reiterated transparency concerns and said he supported Resolution Number 473, a measure to set per-session compensation for the governing body. Councilmember Bowley moved to approve Resolution 473 as amended (which would set work-session pay at $35 for the mayor and $25 for council members), but the motion died for lack of a second and the resolution was not adopted.
The public-comment speakers framed their remarks as questions about openness in hiring and the use of executive sessions. No formal changes to executive-session procedures or to council compensation were adopted at the meeting.
Next steps: The council may place compensation, transparency procedures, or executive-session policies on a future agenda if members request further action.
