Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lathrup Village planners seek tight definition for 'artisan manufacturing,' debate special-use review
Summary
The Planning Commission reviewed a first-draft ordinance to define "artisan manufacturing," focusing on wording to prevent mission creep into light industry, whether the use should be allowed by right or as a special land use, and specific use standards and enforcement measures.
The Lathrup Village Planning Commission on July 21 took a first, detailed look at draft ordinance language to define and regulate "artisan manufacturing," a proposed zoning category intended to allow small-batch maker businesses while preventing heavier industrial uses. Eric Peach, a planning consultant with Giffels Webster, read the proposed definition and said the draft would allow shared or individual use of hand, mechanical and electric tools to make finished products, require a storefront component for sales, and permit artisan manufacturing in three corridor districts: office, commercial-vehicular and mixed-use.
Why it matters: Commissioners said the city wants to encourage makers and fill vacant commercial space while avoiding unanticipated shifts toward light or heavier manufacturing in neighborhoods. The core debate centered on whether to treat artisan manufacturing as a use "by right" (administratively approvable) or as a "special land use" that requires a public hearing and planning-commission review, giving the city more opportunity to impose conditions or to enforce compliance.
Staff and commissioners pressed for a clearer, narrower definition. "All limited artisan manufacturing uses shall have a storefront for sales," Peach read from the draft, and commissioners asked that the definition explicitly list exclusions — for example, mass production, heavy fabrication or bulk processing — so it cannot be reinterpreted as light manufacturing. The chair said the definition should call out accessory retail, showroom or instructional components up front to make the distinction obvious.
Several commissioners urged measurable use standards to make enforcement practical. One member asked for quantifiable thresholds for noise, particulate emissions, vibration and lighting, and for clearer rules about deliveries, storage and hazardous materials handling. "Any external effects such as smoke, noise, soot, dirt, vibration, odor ... should be controlled," a commissioner said while pointing to the city’s existing light-manufacturing language as a reference point.
Timing and process also split the group. Some members favored initially requiring special-land-use review as a gatekeeping tool while the city learns which maker businesses work well in town; others worried that requiring public hearings could add two to three months to approvals and push entrepreneurs to locate elsewhere. Staff noted they could design the process and schedule to address timing if interest proved high.
Public commenters urged caution. John Susana said the commission should "consider an integrated set of ordinances" tied to the master plan; Autumn (last name given during public comment) warned that the category "might too easily become light manufacturing" and urged stronger exclusions. A resident asked for clearer guidance for hobbyists and makers about whether spaces could be leased or used for co-working.
What's next: Staff said they will return with a revised draft that tightens allowed uses and clarifies exclusions, with suggested use standards and examples. Commissioners generally supported additional detail before setting a public hearing. "We’ll take another stab at this," Peach said, and the commission did not vote to adopt any changes at the meeting.
