Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendments Resilience topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Los Fresnos staff outline hazard‑resilience zoning amendments and incentives; commission unanimously recommends them
Summary
A GrantWorks planner presented four proposed zoning amendments funded by a Texas CDBG resilient‑communities grant that add hazard‑resilience application requirements and three incentive programs (stormwater, wildfire protection, shaded parking). Commissioners unanimously recommended the amendments after questions about long‑term maintenance.
City staff and GrantWorks consultant Nick Hill presented proposed amendments to Articles 1–3 of the Los Fresnos zoning ordinance tied to a Texas CDBG resilient‑communities planning grant (contract 23‑160‑015‑E338).
Hill said the grant covers 100% of the cost to draft a comprehensive plan and the ordinance amendments and described four amendments that incorporate hazard resilience into permit review. Under the proposals, applicants for conditional use permits, special use permits, variances and manufactured‑home developments must identify whether their site is within 100‑ or 500‑year floodplains or wildfire risk areas, describe present hazard risks (or state none are present), and explain how proposed uses would affect hazard risks on adjacent properties.
Hill also described three incentive programs designed to encourage resilience features. The on‑site stormwater management incentive awards points for eligible stormwater features; projects that earn up to 6 points can qualify for as much as a 50% reduction in building permit fees. The wildfire protection incentive allows combinations of increased setbacks, separation distances and fire‑resistant construction to earn up to a 60% permit fee reduction. The shaded‑parking incentive encourages trees and landscape area in parking lots and can offer up to a 50% fee reduction when applicants meet tree‑to‑space ratios (for example, four trees per 10 parking spaces).
A commissioner asked whether incentive provisions could be removed after being granted and what would happen to the features; Hill said the ordinance requires long‑term maintenance of installed features and that the city may require maintenance agreements. He said those requirements can be recorded on title so future buyers will see them in county records: “the incentive anything that is installed to receive the incentive is recorded in the title of the property.”
After questions and discussion, a commissioner moved to recommend the amendments and the motion passed by unanimous voice vote.
The commission then proceeded to other items and adjourned at about 7:22 p.m.
