Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Home Elevation Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Westbrook committee questions home-elevation grant's feasibility amid septic, zoning barriers
Summary
Committee members reviewed a Residential Structure Elevation Grant Program document and raised concerns that prior Connecticut programs saw few or no elevations due to long processing times, stringent requirements, high costs, septic-system limits and zoning constraints.
The committee discussed a Residential Structure Elevation Grant Program support document distributed by David Murphy of RLW, noting potential benefits and significant barriers to implementation.
Murphy provided the document to members for review; committee members responded that similar programs in Connecticut historically resulted in few or no home elevations because of long processing times and requirements that made grants less cost-effective than private funding. Members said those outcomes suggest careful design would be needed to produce usable results.
Discussion highlighted zoning issues that may require clarification—such as what modifications are permitted within existing footprints, setback rules and whether raising a house would trigger expansions that affect septic capacity or bedroom counts. Members noted Connecticut septic codes are more restrictive than some jurisdictions such as Cape Cod and Rhode Island, where alternative treatment systems (for example, systems using passive denitrification) may be permitted. The committee emphasized that high costs, health-code compliance and coordinated implementation are barriers to homeowners taking advantage of elevation grants without streamlined processes.
No formal action to adopt a program was taken at the meeting; the grant-support document was retained for further consideration and possible follow-up after additional study and consultation with zoning and health officials.
