Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Decisions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kentucky Public Pensions Authority board approves multiple orders on disability and retirement appeals
Summary
At a board meeting, the Kentucky Public Pensions Authority approved a series of hearing‑officer orders — denying some nonhazardous disability claims, dismissing several appeals (some with prejudice), continuing others with multi‑year reviews, and instructing staff to rewrite one order to grant benefits with a three‑year review. The board also set a May meeting date.
The Kentucky Public Pensions Authority board met and approved a sequence of decisions on contested benefit appeals, including denials, dismissals and continuations, and instructed staff to rewrite one recommended order to grant benefits with a review period.
Staff member requested the board adopt the hearing officer’s recommended order in case 22D‑202 to deny nonhazardous disability benefits; a committee member moved to deny and another member seconded. After the Chair called for the vote the motion carried.
Similarly, the board adopted the hearing officer’s recommended order to deny nonhazardous disability benefits in case 22DD‑26 following a motion and second that passed. For case 23DD‑01 the board rejected the hearing officer’s recommended order and instructed staff to rewrite the recommended order to grant nonhazardous disability benefits with a three‑year review; a committee member moved that instruction and the motion carried.
The board adopted a continuation of nonhazardous disability benefits in case 22T‑11 with a five‑year review and, on remand in case 22T‑79, accepted the hearing officer’s decision to continue benefits with a three‑year review.
In case 22T‑90 the board adopted the hearing officer’s recommended order on remand to grant KPPA’s motion to dismiss the appeal and to order retirement benefits discontinued. The board also adopted orders to dismiss other appeals: case 22T‑78 was dismissed without prejudice, case 23T‑27 was dismissed with prejudice, and case 23A‑16 was dismissed as moot per the board’s modified final order.
During the meeting Staff member told the board that final signed orders might not be ready until the following morning because of timing; staff said it would deliver them no later than tomorrow morning except for one order that requires a rewrite. Board members then discussed availability for a May meeting and indicated the morning of May 27 would work. The Chair moved to adjourn; a member seconded and the meeting concluded.
The meeting records show routine procedural votes on hearing‑officer recommendations, a direction to staff to rewrite one recommended order to grant benefits with a three‑year review, and scheduling and administrative actions. The board did not, in the transcript, detail the underlying factual findings for each appeal; those details will appear in the finalized signed orders.
