Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Picayune council approves amended TIF agreements after heated debate over ad-valorem pledge
Summary
After extended debate about a county-drafted change from a 100% to 50% ad-valorem pledge, the Picayune City Council approved amended development agreements for the Exit 10, Highland Parkway and Price's Creek TIFs on Nov. 18. A development adviser warned the cut "kills the deal," and council members discussed financing and timing before approving the measures.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Picayune City Council on Nov. 18 approved amended and restated development agreements tied to three tax-increment financing (TIF) districts after a lengthy discussion over a change in how ad-valorem taxes would be pledged.
A presenter who identified himself during the finance discussion said he discovered documents showing the county had reduced the pledged ad-valorem share for the city from 100% to 50%, and told the council that the change threatened ongoing development. "It kills the deal," he said, adding that he had called bond counsel and urged the council to correct the apparent error.
Council members pressed for clarity about what had changed and how it would affect financing for developers who had already begun clearing ground. The presenter said the reduction would cut more than $1 million from a deal for one development and could change bank loan calculations that the developers had relied on. He said the TIF structure was intended to "induce" projects that generate retail sales, not just professional services, and described the change as a decision made "in a room in a vacuum."
For its part, the council debated whether to delay action for further review. One member said the board had received papers only minutes before voting and expressed hesitation about approving without more time to review. The presenter replied that developers were already investing and that delays carried carrying costs.
After discussion and questions, the council moved, seconded and voted in favor of the amended Exit 10 agreement; the meeting record shows the motion passed on a voice vote. The council then approved similar amended interlocal and development agreements for the Highland Parkway and Price's Creek TIFs.
Why it matters: TIF agreements determine how future tax revenue is pledged to reimburse developers for infrastructure. Council approval preserves a financing path for multiple local projects and, according to contributors to the discussion, affects whether local developers proceed with planned construction.
The presenter urged the council to coordinate with the county to restore the previously understood terms for residential and commercial components and to accelerate approvals so developers could secure financing. Council members said they would follow up as appropriate.
The council recorded the motions and voice votes and moved on to other agenda items. No vote tallies by name were recorded in the transcript.

