Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declares Wood Oaks subdivision a public nuisance after residents report safety, drainage problems
Summary
Following a code-enforcement presentation and neighborhood testimony, the council declared multiple unfinished lots in Wood Oaks Subdivision a public nuisance, citing water damage, rotted sheathing and debris that pose hazards to children and block drainage.
The Picayune City Council voted to declare a group of unfinished lots and partially built houses in Wood Oaks Subdivision a public nuisance after code enforcement detailed water damage, rotted plywood sheathing, exposed wall anchors and debris threatening public safety and drainage.
Code Enforcement Officer (speaker) told the council the contractor on the identified parcels had begun work and stopped, leaving partial structures and slabs with exposed anchors the city described as tripping hazards and sources of stormwater runoff that have plugged street drains.
The officer read a list of parcel identification numbers and asked the council to declare the project a public nuisance so the city could pursue remediation. The officer said he had tried to contact the contractor without success and recommended the city withhold clearance for any parcel sale until all code violations across the subdivision are addressed.
Property owners who spoke during the hearing supported the council’s action. Chelsea Traina, owner of Good Neighbor Real Estate, told the council that her neighborhood has seven children and listed safety concerns including porta‑potties, dumpsters and rodent problems. “Our property values are suffering,” she said, urging action to protect the neighborhood.
Jacinta Taylor, who said she has lived in the subdivision for 17 years, called the situation “horrible” and said abandoned property has driven down values and embarrassed longtime residents.
The council voted in favor of the nuisance declaration and adjourned the public hearing portion of the item; the mayor asked whether anyone representing the listed properties was present and noted no property owner had appeared. The code officer said the city would proceed with the public‑hearing process and enforce the code as appropriate.
The council’s action enables code enforcement to pursue cleanup or abatement measures under the city’s established code process; the meeting record does not list subsequent remediation steps, costs or a timeline for action.
