Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident asks council to review library programming after tarot readings raised concern

Myrtle Creek City Council · July 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident asked the council to review whether taxpayer-funded library events such as tarot-card readings are appropriate for a public library, especially when programs may involve minors; staff noted the Friends of Myrtle Creek Library operate the building and that the city's agreement limits council interference, but agreed to open a conversation with library leadership.

A Myrtle Creek resident asked the council to review the library's programming policies after expressing concern that events described as tarot-card readings may not align with a public library's educational mission.

"My concern is not based on religion... My concern is about what's appropriate for a public library supported by taxpayer dollars, especially when programming may involve minors," Brandy Vogel said. "Tarot card readings are generally presented as spiritual practice, personal belief, or entertainment. Because of that, I believe the city should carefully consider whether hosting or endorsing these events reflects the purpose of the public institution."

Council and staff responded that the library building is operated by a local nonprofit. "That agreement states that the council has no say," a staff member said, noting that the Friends of Myrtle Creek Library run and privately fund the library under an agreement with the city. Staff suggested outreach to library leadership to discuss expectations for programming in a public building and said the council could open that conversation without directly overturning the library's operating agreement.

No formal change to library policy or programming was made at the meeting; staff said they would contact library representatives and the group's contact (named in discussion) to arrange a conversation about programming expectations.

The council did not prohibit any specific event. The matter was left for further discussion between staff and the Friends group.