Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies proposal to reclassify Locust Lane parcel after residents cite traffic, sewer and character concerns
Summary
On a 5–0 roll call vote the council denied a developer’s request to change a 2.19‑acre parcel at 5601 E. Locust Lane from low‑density to medium‑density residential after multiple neighbors and staff raised compatibility, traffic and sewer‑capacity concerns.
The Nampa City Council voted to deny a comprehensive‑plan map amendment that would have allowed higher‑density housing at 5601 East Locust Lane.
The applicant’s representative, Sean Wardle, said the owner seeks a map change so redevelopment could be economically feasible; he presented concepts showing up to 10 units compared with an estimated 3–5 units under the existing low‑density designation. Wardle said the parcel currently has septic tanks and private wells and that the owner would pursue city utility connections if redevelopment moved forward.
Staff and neighbors oppose
Terry Friend, an associate planner, summarized the planning history: the property sits in an area redesigned as low‑density residential during a 2022–23 comprehensive‑plan reevaluation; the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended denial 5–2, and staff cited concerns that a change would be inconsistent with the surrounding large‑lot character and the council’s long‑range vision.
Multiple neighbors testified in opposition. Steven McCargill said the proposed duplex/townhome development would reduce property values and increase dangerous traffic on Locust Lane; Bob Sun warned the sewer system is near capacity and that the area lacks townhouse precedent; Noreen Nunes and Linda Steele echoed safety and compatibility concerns; Hubert Osborne called the request “spot zoning.”
Council decision
After hearing public testimony and staff analysis, a council member moved to deny the amendment, and the council approved the motion in a roll call vote. The staff report noted the city is preparing a 2050 comprehensive plan review (expected for 2027) and that map designations will be revisited in that process.
What this means
The denial leaves the parcel in the low‑density residential designation; any future attempt to change use will require a new application and public process. Staff noted that annexation and utility‑connection analysis would be required before any development could proceed.
