Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Homestead Credit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MSD Steuben County trustees approve one‑time transfer to restore operations fund after homestead credit change
Summary
The board approved a one‑time resolution to transfer roughly $136,113 from the debt service fund back to the operations fund to restore planned 2026 operations spending after a state homestead‑credit change; the measure passed unanimously.
Get email alerts on the Budget Homestead Credit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Metropolitan School District (MSD) Steuben County Board of Trustees on July 21 approved a one‑time resolution to transfer district homestead credit funds from the debt service fund into the operations fund, a move the district said was necessary to restore the 2026 operations budget affected by recent state changes. The motion passed by voice vote (unanimous).
Dr. Penrod, who presented the item, described the transfer as “a one time thing for 2026” made possible by a short‑term waiver under the recent settlement/rollback correction in state law. He told the board that when the state’s form 22 applied the supplemental homestead credit at both the debt service and operations levels it left the district’s operations budget short of the revenue used when the 2026 budget was built in October 2025.
“Because the ’25 budget was built on that particular amount of revenue, and then the ’26 short session pulled that away, this allows the transfer to take place still in 2026,” Dr. Penrod said. He explained that moving the credit back to operations will restore funds for non‑classroom costs such as custodial, maintenance, transportation and utilities while slightly drawing down the debt service cash balance within statutorily permitted limits.
Board members asked for clarification about what the operations fund covers; Dr. Penrod replied that operations pays for custodial and maintenance staff, bus drivers, utilities and related nonclassroom costs. The district indicated the transfer amount as presented in the packet and in discussion as approximately $136,113 (the transcript lists the figure as “$136,000, $112 and 63” in the presenter’s remarks). Board members pressed no further questions and voted to approve the resolution.
The board and presenters emphasized this is a one‑time remedy related to how the state change was applied to the district’s 2026 revenues; the district said debt service remains sufficiently funded to meet upcoming obligations and that the district could rebuild the debt service balance in future years if desired.
Next steps: the approved resolution will be processed with the county auditor’s office as allowed by the one‑time waiver; no additional local action was requested at the meeting.

