Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Streets Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Molalla officials flag long-term funding gap for street resurfacing; work sessions planned
Summary
City staff told the Budget Committee that planned street work for FY25–26 totals roughly $1.15 million (treatments and capital grind/inlays) but is not sustainable; staff will hold work sessions to consider dedicated funding options such as a utility fee or local gas tax.
Get email alerts on the Streets Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff told the budget committee the city will invest aggressively in street preservation in FY25–26 but that the proposed level of one-time investment is not sustainable without a dedicated revenue source.
Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director Matt Cortell outlined the street program: about $480,000 is budgeted for treatments (crack and slurry seal) and an additional $750,000 is budgeted under street capital for grind and inlays, for a combined program total of roughly $1,150,000. Cortell said the $480,000 targets preventive treatments to extend pavement life, while the $750,000 capital funding addresses streets that require full grind-and-inlay work.
Cortell told committee members the city’s current recurring investment (roughly $300,000 annually) plus this one-time funding will hold the pavement condition index steady for several years but will not improve system-wide condition. He explained the city uses a pavement-condition index and an analytical framework that accounts for underground utilities and coordinated timing (for example, replacing pipes and repaving concurrently) to maximize value.
To address the longer-term funding gap, Cortell said staff will initiate a series of work sessions beginning the 28th to evaluate options, including a small dedicated utility fee on bills or a local gas tax that would require voter approval. He previewed that staff will undertake community engagement before recommending specific mechanisms.
Next steps: the committee accepted the presentation and will consider staff recommendations from the upcoming work sessions when they are scheduled.

