Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Repair And Compliance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board gives 206 Caddo owners 90 days to repair main structure, requires engineer reports and progress checks
Summary
After hearing staff and an owner representative, the board found the main dwelling at 206 (Caddo/Cato) feasible to repair and ordered repairs within 90 days, requiring an engineer's letter, itemized scope, permits and 15-day check-ins; accessory structures were initially proposed for demolition but amended into the repair order.
The San Antonio Building Standards Board on May 7 approved a repair-focused order for the property at 206 (Caddo/Cato) Street, directing the owner to complete repairs to the main structure within 90 days and requiring an engineer's report, an itemized scope of work, updated permits and 15-day progress reports to code officers.
Dangerous premises officer Stephanie Sanchez presented photos and a timeline showing missing siding, extensive water damage, roof and rafter deterioration, missing interior drywall and some reframing done without permits. She recommended repair for the main building and demolition for accessory structures absent a feasible repair plan.
Janet, representing owner Jaime Zapata Flores and a financing company, told the board they had engaged an engineer and planned a full renovation, saying, "We are prepared to invest $60,000 into the rehab," and added the owner had discussed availability up to $80,000 if needed. Board members pressed for detailed, written financial proof, an engineer letter and an itemized cost breakdown.
Board member Robert Behnke moved — and Paul Hernandez seconded — an amended order finding the main structure feasible to repair and requiring a 90-day repair timeline, engineer documentation, 15-day check-ins with code officers and all permits to be pulled before work begins. The board voted with four ayes and one abstention (Dr. Fazal Hussain).
The amended order gives the owner the opportunity to repair; if the owner does not complete required work, the matter may return to the board and other enforcement options, including demolition, remain on the table.
