Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies voluntary 'Share the Air' signage resolution after debate on enforcement and sign control
Summary
Councilors voted 4–1 to deny a resolution to participate in a voluntary Share the Air education program, citing concerns that allowing outside group signage in town parks could create enforcement and First Amendment issues; sponsor emphasized the program is voluntary and nonpunitive.
Get email alerts on the Public Health Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Appomattox Town Council voted 4–1 to deny a resolution that would have authorized voluntary town participation in a "Share the Air" education program aimed at reducing tobacco-related litter and promoting smoke-free outdoor spaces.
Mister Cardwell, who sponsored the resolution, described the program as voluntary and education-based and said it "does not create an ordinance" or penalties and would not require town staff to enforce rules. "This is about leadership through example and not regulation," Cardwell said.
Several council members raised concerns about who would place signage in town parks and whether the town should allow an outside group to install signs. Miss Spiegel and others argued that if the town permitted outside signage it could open the door to other groups seeking to place signs and could lead to legal challenges. Miss Spiegel said the town should control any park signage and, if signs are used, they should be town-produced.
Mister Boyce and Mister Hensley emphasized practical enforcement limits, noting Virginia's limitations on local authority under the Dillon Rule and that the sheriff's office might not be able to enforce a town-level restriction that exceeds state law. Boyce moved to deny the resolution; Miss Spiegel seconded. Roll-call votes recorded: Miss Spiegel — yes; Mister Hensley — yes; Mister Cardwell — no; Mister Boyce — yes; Mister Garrett — yes. The motion to deny carried, 4–1.
Councilors who opposed the resolution said they supported the program's public-health goals but were unwilling to allow a private group's signage in parks or to create unenforceable expectations for staff or the sheriff's office. The sponsor commended the program and was thanked by at least one council member for the work being done, though the council declined to move forward with formal participation.

