Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison County advances Center Ditch drainage work to preliminary assessments
Summary
At a continuation of the Center Ditch public hearing, county staff described a 5,700-foot survey and recommended excavating roughly 2,700 feet of waterway; commissioners approved a resolution to move the project to preliminary assessments, with ODOT covering part of the roadway crossing cost.
Madison County commissioners on Wednesday advanced a proposed drainage project for the Center Ditch to the preliminary-assessment stage after a county presenter described survey findings, a proposed waterway and an estimated cost of about $61,000.
Ken, the project's presenter, told the hearing his team surveyed roughly 5,700 feet of waterway and identified four key constrictions— a submerged driveway, a fence-row restriction, misaligned driveway pipes and a major pinch point where a 15-inch tile and a 24-inch pipe under the road limit flow. "The total project cost comes up to be around $61,000," Ken said, adding that ODOT would handle work related to the roadway crossing, reducing the county's share by about $30,000.
The measure approved by the commissioners authorizes staff to prepare preliminary assessments, mail notices to affected property owners and schedule a final hearing. Ken described the recommended construction as clipping the waterway from the road back to the property line over about 2,700 feet, placing the new surface swale on a county maintenance roster so it can be cleaned out if it silts. He said construction would likely be scheduled for winter to minimize crop impacts and that ODOT prefers to install a 24-inch culvert if given notice.
Property owners at the hearing raised concerns about crop damage, subsurface systems and the effect on property values. A participant who identified workplace experience in real estate urged attention to disclosure rules for flood-prone parcels, saying sellers must reveal issues that could affect buyer decisions. "If he ever goes to put the property up for sale, he has to disclose any issues that might impact potential buyers' decision to buy the property," the resident said. Ken replied that the county's benefit–cost analysis takes into account potential property losses, including the need to replace a failed leach field.
The formal motion introduced at the end of the hearing asked the commissioners to find the improvement necessary to protect public welfare and to direct the county engineer to prepare reports, plans and schedules under the applicable county code. The motion was moved by the commissioner who spoke during the roll call and seconded by the chair; the transcript records affirmative roll-call responses as the hearing closed. The transcript does not list a full roll-call tally for all commissioners present.
Next steps: county staff will file preliminary assessments, mail summary packets to recipients and set a final hearing date after receiving contractor pricing and completing a benefit–cost analysis. Preliminary assessments are expected to be due in roughly 30–45 days, at which point a final hearing and a staff recommendation to the commissioners will follow.
