Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Regulation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission recommends council adopt floodplain overlay changes prompted by FEMA litigation

Hubbard Planning Commission · April 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff said the code amendment (LA 2026-02) is a response to a federal case about FEMA and the Endangered Species Act and mainly requires applicants to provide documentation that development in the floodplain will not harm listed species; the commission recommended approval and no members of the public testified.

The Hubbard Planning Commission voted to recommend that the city council adopt Legislative Amendment LA 2026‑02, which amends section 2‑110 of the development code—the floodplain overlay—by adding documentation requirements and updating definitions in response to a federal lawsuit concerning FEMA and the Endangered Species Act.

Laura Roth, the city planner, told the commission the city had reviewed three options arising from the litigation; the council chose option 2, which requires applicants to provide documentation showing "there is no impact" to listed species or to submit materials consistent with the program's compliance approach. Roth said the amendment primarily adjusts language and adds documentation requirements rather than imposing new substantive prohibitions on development within the existing overlay.

Roth walked commissioners through the four review criteria in the staff report—consistency with the comprehensive plan and Oregon statewide planning goals, adequate facilities (not directly applicable to the amendment), consistency with the code's purpose to protect public health and safety and natural features suitability—and said state entities and the county had no recommended changes and supported the amendment as written.

The commission opened the floor for public testimony and the chair recorded that no one came forward. After limited commissioner discussion, a motion recommending the city council adopt the code text as presented was made, seconded and approved; the chair announced the motion carries. The recommendation will be passed to city council for the final decision.

What it means next: If council adopts the amendment, applicants proposing development in the floodplain will need to provide the documentation described in the revised code to demonstrate no adverse effect on protected species or choose one of the compliance paths specified in the amendment. Staff will notify property owners in the overlay and other agencies as required by state law.