Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Front Yard Fence Accommodation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Erlanger councilors press for simple front‑yard accommodation process to help families of residents with disabilities
Summary
Council members discussed creating a short, plain‑language application and public education campaign so residents can request reasonable accommodations — such as front‑yard fences — more easily, with staff noting PDS has posted a FAQ and that requests are referred to the city administrator and city attorney for review.
Council members in Erlanger discussed steps to simplify how residents request reasonable accommodations — including front‑yard fences — for disabilities, aiming to remove procedural barriers and clarify what documentation the city needs.
Council member Michelle Fields urged the council to lead on the issue after several recent drownings of children with autism, saying the city should "make these changes and let other agencies follow suit." Fields framed the proposal as a safety measure, not an effort to change the underlying zoning code.
A council member who tested the application process told colleagues that Planning & Development Services (PDS) has created an FAQ on reasonable‑accommodation requests but that PDS generally refers such requests to the city administrator and city attorney because front‑yard fences are not currently allowed under existing ordinance. The council member recommended creating "a simple, clear document called an application for reasonable accommodation" that would explain required information, who to contact, and what documentation (for example a verification from a medical professional) the city would accept.
Council members debated practical limits and safeguards — for example recommending how far a permitted front‑yard barrier could extend from a porch — so the city can offer consistent, visually acceptable accommodations. One member suggested the application include plain‑language definitions (for instance, explaining the term "elopement") so families unfamiliar with technical terms can complete the process without added burden.
Mayor and other members asked staff to include the proposed template in materials for review. The council directed Councilwoman Fields to provide a draft example application and agreed to pursue public education to make the PDS FAQ and the new form easy for residents to find and use. No legislative change or ordinance vote was taken at the caucus; the discussion centered on producing administrative materials and public outreach.
