Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public hearing on 76 North Broadway spotlights fight over Woodcliff mansion preservation

Village of Irvington Board of Trustees · July 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a public hearing on a Varma Development proposal for 76 North Broadway, lawyers and architects debated a request for modest additional lot coverage/FAR in exchange for one extra moderate-income unit; preservationists urged trustees to delay any bonus until reuse of the Woodcliff mansion and stone walls is fully evaluated.

The Village of Irvington opened a public hearing on a proposed mixed-use redevelopment at 76 North Broadway that asks trustees to permit an extra 5% lot coverage and a 0.05 increase in floor-area ratio as a public-benefit bonus.

Catherine Zelandus, counsel for the applicant Varma Development, described a revised proposal for 53 residential units, of which the applicant said six would be moderate-income units and six would be fair-and-affordable units if the bonus is granted; counsel said the project’s fiscal analysis estimates roughly $700,000 in additional annual revenue to the village and an estimated increase of about 12 school children.

Preservationists and local architects urged the board to withhold any bonus until the project complies with MFO (Mixed-Form Overlay) zoning provisions requiring that buildings reflecting historic character be retained "to the greatest extent practicable." Architect Peter Boudary and other signatories argued Woodcliff is historically significant, cited a petition with more than 1,100 signatures and letters from the Irvington Historic Society and preservation professionals, and said earlier October 2024 plans demonstrated adaptive reuse was practicable.

The applicant responded that prior schemes considered saving the mansion but were infeasible because they could not provide safe fire-department access without 20-foot retaining walls or similarly major changes; counsel said the project team had discussed access constraints with the fire department and that some earlier designs that retained Woodcliff could not meet current fire access standards.

Residents also raised concerns about removal of stone walls and the width and location of a DOT-required 26-foot driveway entrance from Broadway. Speakers pressed whether the village could count a porous fire access road differently under the code; trustees and village counsel said that would require a municipal code amendment and could not be decided as a one-off at this hearing.

The board closed the public hearing and will take the item up at a later meeting after reviewing comments and legal/technical follow-up. No bonus was granted or denied at the meeting.