Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Storage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee OKs seasonal-storage category, limits placement to 180 days and adds 10-foot setback

Business and Economic Development Committee · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved changes to the temporary-storage ordinance to add a seasonal-storage category (180 days per placement, prohibited in residential and flood-hazard zones), switch approvals to a certificate of occupancy, remove some subjective screening rules and add a 10-foot setback for seasonal units.

The Business and Economic Development Committee approved amendments to the city's temporary-storage rules that create a new "seasonal storage" use and change how temporary storage is regulated.

Planning Officer Anya Collette told the committee the proposed seasonal category would cover storage units placed on a site for part of the year (for example summer or fall) and removed the rest of the year; seasonal units would be limited to 180 days per placement and would not be allowed in residential zones or flood-hazard areas. Collette also said staff propose moving temporary-storage approvals from a work-appeals process to issuance of a certificate of occupancy and removing subjective aesthetic and screening standards that were effectively permanent requirements for a temporary use.

Members pressed staff on duration and enforcement: Collette confirmed an initial temporary-storage authorization remains one year with the possibility of a one-year extension, while the new seasonal category could return year after year but only be present 180 days at a time. Staff noted that code prevents exceeding building-coverage maximums and that attempts to stack seasonal and temporary approvals to create indefinite placement would be subject to code review.

The committee agreed to add a 10-foot setback from property lines for seasonal units to address neighbor visibility concerns. A motion to approve the amended item passed in a roll-call vote with recorded ‘yes’ votes from Councilors Falloon, Fish, Mallard and Carson.

What’s next: Staff will finalize ordinance language reflecting the 10-foot setback and the certificate-of-occupancy approval path and forward the amended item to the next council step.