Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Panhandling Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff urges caution as Edwardsville reviews draft targeting aggressive panhandling
Summary
City staff said a draft ordinance focused on aggressive conduct — not the act of asking for money — draws on a Kansas model but could face constitutional challenge; council members asked about medians, loitering and public‑safety enforcement and requested further legal review.
City staff presented a draft ordinance aimed at regulating aggressive panhandling behaviors and emphasized that the proposed language targets conduct rather than the status of individuals. The presenter said the draft largely follows a Kansas ordinance staff regarded as legally consistent with common practice but cautioned that amendments could invite constitutional challenges.
"What we're trying to regulate is not panhandle. We're trying to regulate aggressive behavior," the presenter said, describing actions such as stepping into traffic, reaching into vehicles or obstructing movement as behaviors the ordinance would prohibit. The presenter said staff vetted a range of ordinances and consulted legal publications to identify language that has more commonly survived litigation.
Council members raised concerns about public safety and definitions in the draft. One council member described standing next to a stopped car in the roadway as a safety hazard and asked whether medians or transit stations would be treated differently. Staff and council discussed existing loitering statutes and the need to differentiate protected speech from conduct that creates a safety risk. Staff advised they would research precise applications and return with recommended language.
The council did not adopt a final ordinance in the provided transcript and no vote was recorded during these segments. Staff said further legal review was necessary before any final action.
