Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Fences topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission introduces zoning amendment to relax clear-vision rule for fences near driveways

Mount Clemens City Commission · July 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Mount Clemens commissioners introduced for first reading an amendment to section 9.3 of the zoning ordinance to narrow the restricted area near driveway intersections while allowing slightly taller barriers, a change staff says preserves safety while easing homeowner impacts.

Mount Clemens commissioners introduced for first reading a proposed amendment to section 9.3 of the city zoning ordinance that would revise clear-vision requirements for fences, walls, hedges and similar barriers near the intersection of a driveway and the public right of way. A motion to introduce the first reading and set the second reading and adoption for Aug. 3, 2026, passed on a roll-call vote.

City staff summarized the planning commission's recommendation and said the revision reduces the restricted area where barriers must be kept to 3 feet in height while permitting a maximum height of 3.5 feet in a slightly smaller zone immediately adjacent to a driveway approach. "Staff believe the existing requirement is more restrictive than necessary to achieve its intended safety purpose," a staff presentation stated, adding that the remainder of the proposed amendments are clarifying and do not substantively change the section.

Several commissioners voiced support, saying the change balances visibility for drivers and pedestrians with homeowners' desires for privacy and security. One commissioner said the amendment helps homeowners install or maintain fencing or landscaping without unduly compromising safety.

The ordinance will return for a second reading and possible adoption at the Aug. 3 meeting. No public hearing testimony on the amendment was recorded during this session.