Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rock Hill Quarry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Ladue council for independent traffic, school and stormwater review of Rock Hill Quarry plan
Summary
Residents urged the City of Ladue to demand updated traffic analyses, an independent traffic study and clarity about school‑capacity and stormwater impacts for the proposed Rock Hill Quarry redevelopment, and pressed council to ensure the development meets the city's established standards.
Kelly Ainsworth, speaking on behalf of residents, urged the City of Ladue to scrutinize the proposed Rock Hill Quarry redevelopment, citing concerns about traffic, stormwater management, financial effects on the city and impacts to the Ladue School District. "Residents support appropriate development that complies with the City's established standards," Ainsworth said, and indicated citizens intend to remain engaged in the review process.
Mayor Nancy Spewak opened the special meeting at 8:00 a.m. and limited public comment to a total of 15 minutes and three minutes per speaker. She also urged residents to attend the Zoning & Planning Commission meeting on June 24 at 4 p.m. at the St. Louis County Library 2D Clark Branch.
Multiple speakers focused first on traffic. Sheryl Rose asked the council to commission an independent traffic study, citing existing congestion on McKnight Road and questioning whether the developer's proposed traffic improvements would address anticipated increases. "I am concerned about existing congestion along McKnight Road," Rose said, and asked whether the proposed improvements would be adequate.
Other commenters raised related safety and capacity concerns. Ted Wight warned additional traffic could alter the character of Litzsinger Road and create safety risks for pedestrians and bicyclists. Kevin Smith asked whether regional partners, including the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and neighboring municipalities, would participate in planned traffic work, and questioned why the development review was proceeding amid significant public opposition.
Joanna Green said the Ladue School District and Reed Elementary already face class sizes above established targets and argued that more residential units could further strain the district's educational resources. Bradley Shepherd questioned whether the traffic studies and enrollment projections relied on by reviewers remain valid and whether the review timeline allows for updated analyses.
Justin Aylward expressed firm opposition to the high-density residential proposal, saying it lacks community support and urging the city to discontinue consideration of the current plan. Jennifer Belmont Jennings asked city staff to clarify the legal status of the review and whether the proposal could still be denied through the public process.
The public comment period primarily recorded resident concerns and requests for more analysis and transparency; the meeting record does not contain developers27 responses or staff commitments to specific new studies. The council then moved to other business and later entered a closed session to discuss legal and contract matters. The Zoning & Planning Commission was scheduled to convene that evening to consider related zoning matters, providing the next formal public step in the review process.
