Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Speakers urge Billings council to consider sanctuary-city protections after recent ICE actions
Summary
Multiple public commenters, including members of the Billings Alliance for Immigrant Rights and local teachers, asked the Billings City Council to adopt sanctuary-city protections and press for a meeting with the mayor after recent ICE operations in Montana; councilmembers said public comment would be taken under advisement.
Get email alerts on the Immigration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A string of public commenters at the Billings City Council work session pressed the city to act after recent large-scale ICE operations elsewhere in Montana.
Lane Dorsey, who identified himself as a member of the Billings Alliance for Immigrant Rights, told the council that two fathers had been killed after ICE operations in other states and that community members in Gallatin County were recently detained in a sweep. "We are here tonight to demand justice for Lorenzo Salgado Araujo and Yohan Sebastian Guerrero," Dorsey said, arguing the council could take steps to prevent similar actions locally and calling for Billings to become a sanctuary city.
Other speakers repeated the request. Tessa Miller, a teacher with Billings Public Schools, said she speaks as a parent and educator: "I just really am asking that you guys take into consideration a sanctuary city," she told the council, adding concerns for students whose families could be affected. Mindy Nelson, a longtime resident and postal-worker, pressed council members for a direct commitment that staff or elected officials would respond to organizers' repeated outreach.
Mayor and council did not take immediate action during the work session. The mayor closed the general public-comment period at the end of the segment and moved the council to the next agenda items; staff said the comments would be entered into the public record and considered as the council and administration evaluate next steps. No formal motion or vote on sanctuary proposals occurred at the meeting.
Why it matters: Sanctuary-city measures typically involve local limits on cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and can raise legal and fiscal questions about the scope of municipal authority. Several speakers urged the council to meet with organizers and the mayor to discuss specific policy options.
What to watch next: The council did not set a date at the work session for follow-up on this demand; organizers said they will request a formal meeting with the mayor and any council members who choose to meet with them.

