Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance 674 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
First reading of Winterset ordinance to revise "in‑home day care" definition fails; council tables item
Summary
A first-reading motion for Ordinance No. 674, which would amend the city code definition of “In Home Day Care Provider,” failed for lack of a second on July 20; the council then voted to table the ordinance to a later, unscheduled date after a brief public hearing and resident comments about notification and parking.
Council Member Mary Ann Orr moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 674, which would amend Section 4.12003 of the Winterset Municipal Code to change the definition of “In Home Day Care Provider,” but the motion failed for lack of a second at the July 20 meeting. Council Member Orr subsequently moved to table the matter for a later date; Council Member Christopher Fairholm seconded and the motion to table passed unanimously among members present.
The council had entered a public hearing at 7:18 p.m. on Ordinance No. 674; notice of publication was on file and no written protests were received. During the hearing a resident at 1524 W Jefferson St said the proposed change was “not a low impact business,” expressing concern about neighborhood effects. A resident at 316 W Jefferson St said they were “working on parking issues,” a point raised in relation to the ordinance’s local impacts.
The transcript records the public comments and procedural motions but does not include a detailed ordinance text in the record beyond the stated purpose (to amend the definition of in‑home day care provider). After the failed first‑reading motion, the council’s decision to table leaves the ordinance without a new hearing date; the transcript states the matter was tabled to a later date that has not been set.
The council did not record additional staff findings or a timeline for further public notice at the meeting. Residents’ comments at the hearing asked that notification and parking impacts be considered; the transcript does not show responses from staff or a commitment to additional outreach during the meeting.
