Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

After brief hearing Cullman City Council declares two lots a public nuisance

Cullman City Council · July 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following a public hearing in which the property representative said the lots had been cleaned and would be maintained, the Cullman City Council adopted Resolution 2026-117 declaring 306 and 310 10th Avenue SE to be public nuisances; city staff reiterated the owner may abate the condition before the city acts.

The Cullman City Council adopted Resolution 2026-117 after a public hearing to declare two properties — 306 and 310 10th Avenue Southeast — a public nuisance.

At the microphone, Ryan Warner said the lots were properties of his late mother, that family members had cleaned the sites after receiving the notice and that he "takes responsibility" for maintenance going forward: "We cleaned it up. We're definitely gonna do a better job of keeping it clean and trying to get us hold." City staff member Blake told the council the city had fulfilled state-code notice requirements for abatement and that the owner could remedy the condition before the city conducted any physical abatement, which would avoid the city placing a lien for abatement costs.

Council members asked clarifying questions about how a declaration would affect future complaints; staff said adopting the nuisance declaration now would not preclude the owner from cleaning the property and that a lien would not be imposed if the owner abated the condition before the city performed the work. The council then moved to adopt Resolution 2026-117 and the motion carried.

Next steps: the resolution declares the properties nuisances under the city’s current process; staff said they are finalizing updates to the nuisance ordinance and expect the item to return to a future council meeting with clarified abatement procedures.