Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commissioner Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves amendment to alter pay schedule, rescinding planned salary increase for next commission
Summary
Giles County commissioners passed an amendment to change the pay schedule for meeting attendance and moved to rescind a planned salary increase for the next commission; public comment raised concerns the change could set a precedent for other boards and could affect committee attendance incentives.
Giles County commissioners voted to approve an amendment altering the county's pay schedule for commissioners and moved to rescind a planned salary increase that had been scheduled for the next commission.
The amendment, attributed on the floor to Commissioner Reed and seconded by a colleague, proposed changing the per-meeting pay schedule (the transcript links the change to committee-meeting pay and full-commission pay). The chair said a "yes" vote would rescind the raise planned for the incoming commission and keep meeting-based pay at the new rates; a "no" vote would leave the planned salary increase in place as earlier budgeted. The amendment was put to a vote and was recorded in the meeting transcript as passing.
At the public-comment period, resident Mike Sesser told commissioners he opposed linking commissioner pay to the county executive's salary and said such a change could set a precedent affecting other elected boards. "My name is Mike Sesser, and I'd like to speak about the commissioner's compensation," he said, and urged commissioners to consider unintended consequences for school boards and for incentives tied to committee attendance.
Commission discussion also included a failed motion to postpone consideration of the resolution before the amendment was offered. The chair walked the body through the consequences of each vote option before the final recorded votes on the amendment and on the full resolution as amended. The meeting transcript records the amendment as passing and then proceeds to the vote on the full resolution; the transcript does not contain a clear, complete roll-call tally for the final resolution vote in the excerpt provided.
The commission did not provide an immediate, formal implementation date in the recorded discussion; the chair explained that a successful "yes" vote would restore the meeting-based pay plan rather than the scheduled salary. Any further technical changes to the adopted pay schedule or implementation steps were not detailed in the recorded segments.
