Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pretrial Intervention topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances bill allowing solicitors to place defendants into pretrial diversion more than once

House Judiciary Committee · April 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee gave H.3057 a favorable report. The bill would allow a solicitor to consent to a person participating in pretrial intervention (PTI) more than once, with an explicit exclusion for domestic violence charges; members debated open-endedness, victims' input and fees.

The House Judiciary Committee gave a favorable report to H.3057, a bill that would allow a solicitor to consent to a person’s participation in pretrial intervention (PTI) more than once while explicitly prohibiting repeat PTI for criminal domestic violence charges.

Mr. Weeks, reporting for the Bridal Law Subcommittee, said the bill amends sections of code to permit a solicitor to give consent for PTI participation more than one time, but it still bars a second PTI participation where the prior participation was for a domestic violence offense: "This bill would lift that bar if the solicitor consents," he said, adding that the bill mirrors language that passed previously.

Several members pressed for limits. Mr. Quinn asked whether unlimited PTI participation would defeat the program’s purpose and whether sign-off must always be by the solicitor rather than staff. Members discussed that the solicitor has discretion and that PTI can provide treatment options that a fine alone does not, a point emphasized by supporters who said PTI can reduce recidivism.

Representative Rutherford and others argued the solicitor’s discretion is appropriate and that solicitors are accountable to voters, while some members sought stronger victim input and transparency. Committee discussion also touched on existing application fees and whether fees should change if an individual enters PTI multiple times; the transcript records existing state fees but no bill language changing them.

The committee recorded a favorable report for H.3057 by voice vote; the transcript does not record a roll-call tally.