Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Office Consolidation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Griggs County Commission discusses proposal to merge auditor and treasurer offices
Summary
At a July 20 public meeting, the Griggs County Commission discussed a plan to combine the county auditor and treasurer offices. Staff and office employees said consolidation would improve coverage and cross‑training; one member urged the change be placed before voters. No final decision was made.
The Griggs County Commission held a public meeting July 20 to outline a proposal to consolidate the county auditor and county treasurer into a single office and to collect public comment. The chair said no final decision would be made at the session and that the meeting was intended to provide information and gather input.
The commission distributed a spreadsheet comparing the current separate offices with a proposed combined structure and noted that, according to materials shown at the meeting, 23 of the state’s 53 counties already have merged the two offices. The chair described the expected benefits as “streamlin[ing] financial operations, reduc[ing] duplication of administrative work,” improving cross‑training and providing greater continuity during staff absences. The chair also told attendees that annual independent audits and commission oversight would continue and said the proposal was not intended to eliminate elected offices.
Maddie, identified at the meeting as the Griggs County treasurer and a former auditor’s deputy, told commissioners she supports the change and said the transition has been going “really well.” She noted recent auditor/treasurer conferences where officials from combined counties meet and said staff can contact peers in counties that have already merged to learn from their experience.
One committee member objected to moving forward without a public vote. The member argued that “the people deserve the vote” and warned against implementing the consolidation without explicit voter approval. The chair responded that the commission is holding multiple open meetings and that waiting for a ballot could require filling the existing vacant position in the meantime; the chair said the commission could still place the consolidated office on a future ballot if the arrangement proved unsuitable.
Commissioners and staff discussed estimated savings but did not adopt a final budget figure at the meeting. The chair stated the annual net savings would be “about 60” (reported in discussion as roughly $60,000–$68,000 when salary and benefits were factored). The meeting record does not confirm a final cost estimate.
No motions to change the structure were made or voted on at the session. The commission approved the meeting agenda at the start and later adjourned; the chair closed the meeting at 9:28 a.m. and scheduled a follow‑up public meeting for July 27 at 7 p.m. to continue discussion.
The commission invited members of the public to attend upcoming open meetings and to speak with staff in the auditor and treasurer offices to raise questions or concerns.
