Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Sports Complex topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission urges council study potential impacts of 76‑acre sports complex on nearby preserves
Summary
After reviewing RFP finalists and community‑engagement plans for a proposed 76‑acre sports complex, the Lake Elmo Parks Commission voted to ask the city council to evaluate potential impacts on Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Sunfish Lake Park, citing concerns about noise, lights, traffic and wildlife.
The Lake Elmo Parks Commission voted July 20 to recommend that the city council evaluate how a proposed 76‑acre sports complex might affect neighboring Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Sunfish Lake Park.
The commission heard a staff update from Jason on an RFP that drew nine proposals and asked whether the commission wanted an active role in community engagement and contractor selection. Jason said the RFP sought four core deliverables: financial scenarios for sports facilities, non‑sports amenities, community engagement strategies and a development/phasing plan, plus a long‑term management recommendation.
Commissioners said the commission should have touch points throughout the process, including a task force or standing agenda item to review final materials before council. One commissioner said the scope could include tournament‑level fields, lights and concessions — features that would materially change traffic, noise and wildlife effects — and urged early study rather than waiting until a design is final.
“Is this something you’re going to hear feedback from the sports associations?” Jason asked, noting the RFP requires a community engagement plan with a webpage, stakeholder meetings, open houses and a survey aligned with the national community survey tool the city uses. Jason told the commission staff planned to present finalists and a recommendation to council on Aug. 18, with the option of a special meeting if the commission wants more time.
After discussion about sound amplification, flood lights, parking and habitat connectivity, the commission approved a motion recommending council evaluate whether the site is an appropriate location and how the project could affect the two adjacent parks. The motion was approved by voice vote.
Next steps: staff will finalize RFP follow‑ups with finalists, coordinate the community‑engagement plan that includes commission involvement, and bring the finalist packets and scoring to the council meeting scheduled for Aug. 18, according to staff.
