Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors deny conditional rezoning for 20‑lot subdivision on US‑360 after residents raise water and rural‑character concerns

Amelia County Board of Supervisors · July 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a contested public hearing with neighbors warning about water availability and loss of rural character, the board denied a conditional rezoning request to rezone a parcel along US‑360 for a 20‑lot subdivision; the applicant had proffered buffers and a hydrogeologic study.

The Amelia County Board of Supervisors denied a conditional rezoning request to convert a parcel along U.S. Route 360 from RR‑3 to R‑1 to allow a 20‑lot single‑family subdivision.

Planning staff summarized the application and noted voluntary proffers the applicant offered, including a 50‑foot buffer along the northern property line and a requirement to complete a hydrogeologic study per county code. The planning commission had recommended approval by an 8–1 vote, and staff said the revised conceptual plan was intended to be consistent with the county’s comprehensive plan.

Several nearby residents opposed the rezoning during the public hearing, citing concerns about Amelia’s rural character and groundwater. Howard Gregory Jenkins, who said he has lived locally for more than three decades, told the board: “Amelia County is rural. If we make it like Chesterfield, you're gonna be like Powhatan … That is not the reason. Amelia is rural.” Another resident asked that the proffered buffer be memorialized in the record so it could not be disturbed.

The applicant's representative, Brady Deal of Main Street Homes (Windswept Development), said the proposal aligned with the comprehensive plan, described a conservative absorption model and offered to proffer additional protections; he noted the developer would preserve about 500 feet off the road as open space and had proffered a five‑year well warranty if a newly drilled well were to fail due to unforeseen impacts.

Board discussion focused on water availability, the cumulative effect of nearby projects on groundwater and emergency service costs. After deliberation, a supervisor moved to deny the conditional rezoning based on location, likely impacts and community concern; the motion carried.

What happens next: The denial stands unless the applicant withdraws and resubmits a revised proposal or appeals per the county''s zoning process.