Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Cup Appeal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Valley County staff outlines appeal of denial for Shoemaker storage CUP extension
Summary
County staff told commissioners an applicant has appealed a Planning & Zoning denial of a requested three-year extension for a conditional-use permit to build a storage facility; staff said technical reviews are mostly complete but the development agreement remains pending and no final Board decision is recorded in the provided transcript.
County staff summarized an appeal filed after the Planning & Zoning Commission denied a request to extend a conditional-use permit for a proposed Shoemaker storage facility.
A county staff member told the Valley County Board of County Commissioners that the appellant, Jeff Hatch of Hatch Design Architecture representing Shoemaker Properties, requested a three-year extension for CUP 20-234 on March 13, 2026. The staff report said the original CUP took effect May 23, 2023, and that the board had previously approved a two-year extension on May 9, 2024. The Planning & Zoning Commission denied the current extension request on May 14 by a 3–1 vote; the applicant filed a timely appeal on May 22.
The staff report described the approved project as a public self-storage facility with an office and five storage buildings planned on the southern portion of the parcel, with primary access from Old State Road and emergency access from Eagle Lane. The record contains two different parcel-size figures: the staff report lists 26.97 acres, while a separate line in the report references 29.67 acres; the transcript does not resolve that discrepancy.
Staff said the extension request was prompted by ongoing groundwater monitoring and that, according to the applicant's materials, phase 1 site improvements including construction of Building C and Canopy D were proposed for summer 2026, with additional buildings slated in a later (2028) phase. The staff report said the county engineer had approved grading and drainage plans and the stormwater report, and that the county engineer recommended approval of the grading and drainage plans.
County staff told commissioners the applicant has been working with multiple agencies and county departments, including Valley County P&Z staff, the road department, Central District Health, Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), and the Valley County engineer. Staff said ITD confirmed that a full traffic impact study was not required and had preliminarily approved the concept for an intersection realignment that would include a right-hand turn lane. Staff also referenced applicant submittal exhibits (labeled j through n) and a revision produced to reflect 2027 traffic projections after P&Z concerns.
The staff report cited Valley County ordinance —20 25 0 7— and Title 9, Chapter 5 conditional-use standards in its analysis. The transcript does not include the P&Z Commission's reasoning for the denial or any Board action on the appeal in the provided segment.
As presented to the board in the recorded segments, the outstanding technical items were largely described as addressed or under review, while the development agreement remained outstanding. The provided transcript ends before any final decision by the board; the record does not show a motion, vote, or other formal outcome on the appeal within the included segments.
