Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marice Guis leads commission in approving consent agenda and outlines historic‑district permit rules
Summary
At a June 3, 2016 meeting, the chair explained the commission's advisory role on historic‑district permits, reviewed public‑comment and permit requirements, and the body approved minutes and a five‑item consent agenda; certificates of appropriateness will be mailed within 10 days.
Marice Guis, who identified herself as the commission president, opened the June 3, 2016 meeting of a city‑appointed commission and reviewed the panel's role advising the city manager on requests for permits in historic districts. She told attendees how to obtain translation devices and explained the rules for public‑comment time and for ceding speaking time.
The commission's chair said appeals of administrative decisions can be filed under the city’s Código de Desarrollo Unificado (Unified Development Code), and she emphasized that commission approval does not replace required building permits. She described limits on ceded time: a person receiving another speaker’s time may only do so twice, and the original speaker must be present to cede time.
The body moved to approve minutes and acted on the consent agenda. A motion to approve the minutes of the May 20 meeting was made and seconded; the transcript records the minutes date as “May 20, 2026,” which appears inconsistent with the meeting date and may be a transcription error in the record. The chair then proposed approval of consent‑agenda items 1–5 with staff stipulations; that motion was seconded and carried. Several case addresses on the consent agenda were announced as approved, and the chair said certificates of appropriateness for approved cases would be mailed within 10 days.
Roll call votes on the motions were taken aloud by the chair; the transcript records affirmative responses from commissioners as follows: Neman, Velázquez, Guevara, Gru, Travieso, Holland, Betzer, Gibbs and Galloway (all recorded as “sí”). The transcript does not record any 'no' or abstention votes.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 3:30 p.m.
The record shows the commission conducted routine procedural business, clarified permit and appeal procedures under the Unified Development Code, and authorized staff‑stipulated approvals on the consent agenda. Certificates of appropriateness will be issued to successful applicants within 10 days and permit holders were reminded not to begin work until they have obtained all required permits.
