Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission grants variance for 12‑foot retaining walls on Pat Patterson Parkway site
Summary
The planning commission approved a variance allowing three retaining walls up to 12 feet tall for a Pat Patterson Parkway subdivision, finding topographic hardship; staff recommended landscaping and slope‑compliance conditions and the commission approved the variance with those conditions.
The Oxford Planning Commission approved a variance requested by Russell Construction to allow three retaining walls up to 12 feet tall as part of a subdivision proposed along Pat Patterson Parkway.
The applicant seeks relief from the retaining‑wall height standard to accommodate steep topography on a 16.5‑acre site. The project presented plans for 124 single‑family detached lots within the housing‑accelerator overlay district. Staff told commissioners the consolidated approach of three taller walls reduces the overall disturbed footprint compared with multiple terraced walls and that staff found sufficient hardship to support a variance. Staff recommended approval with conditions requiring a landscaping plan (including evergreen screening) and that slope requirements between the wall and the property line be met during site‑plan review.
Commissioners asked for clarification about proximity to the property line and how the wall would be constructed. Applicant representatives described using no‑fines concrete and backfill techniques to leave a two‑foot buffer behind the wall and said they will grade and add swales so water flows toward an on‑site pond rather than over the walls. After discussion and no public comment, a commissioner moved to approve the variance with staff conditions; the motion passed by voice vote.
Why it matters: the variance allows the developer to build taller consolidated walls to achieve the density allowed by the housing‑accelerator overlay while minimizing the disturbed footprint, subject to landscaping and slope conditions that staff will verify at site‑plan review.
Next steps: the applicant must incorporate the required landscaping and grading details into the site plan and demonstrate compliance with slope and buffer requirements during subsequent review.
