Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sanitary district proposes two-phase sewer rate increase to address $700,000 shortfall and fund capital plan

Michigan City Common Council · July 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public Works Director Wendy Vache told the council the Michigan City Sanitary District faces a roughly $700,000 operating deficit and proposed a two-phase rate increase that would raise about $1.9 million a year in each of two phases, enable bonding for capital projects and institute impact fees. The ordinance was held for a second reading.

Wendy Vache, Michigan City's public works director, told the council the Michigan City Sanitary District is in a weakened financial state and presented a two-phase ordinance to raise sewer rates, implement system-development charges and adjust fees. Vache said audits show a roughly $700,000 cash-flow deficit and insufficient depreciation funding, and that the district cannot access long-term bonds without improving its financial metrics.

"We proposed the rate increase in 2 phases," Vache said. She described Phase 1, to take effect Sept. 1 and appear on bills in October, as intended to cover current operating and maintenance expenses and restore depreciation funding; Phase 2 is planned for January 2028 to build creditworthiness for long-term borrowing. The combined increases are projected to generate roughly $3.8 million per year after both phases (about $1.9 million per phase), she said.

The proposal includes new system development or impact fees for new development and proposes a 14.9% surcharge on accounts outside Michigan City limits. Vache said the district proposes phased rate increases of roughly $10 per month (at a 4,000-gallon consumption baseline) with Phase 1 bringing a residential bill closer to $40.35 from about $30.

Public commenters at the hearing were split. Some residents urged the council to approve rates to avoid state intervention; others said they were alarmed at the potential household cost and asked for more transparency on prioritization. After discussion the council scheduled the ordinance for a second reading rather than taking immediate final action.