Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Hudson Valley Volkswagen topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board authorizes draft negative declaration for Hudson Valley Volkswagen after landscaping, wetland and traffic issues discussed

Wappinger Planning Board · July 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The planning board discussed landscaping, wetland jurisdiction, variances, and on-site truck-turning/loading zones for the Hudson Valley Volkswagen site plan and voted to authorize the planner to draft a negative declaration for the project.

The Wappinger Planning Board reviewed the Hudson Valley Volkswagen site-plan and special-use permit and directed the applicant to refine landscaping, delineate a safe loading/unloading area, and complete town wetland permitting. After discussion, the board authorized the planner to draft a negative declaration for the project and voted in favor.

During the meeting, applicant representatives proposed nonmovable landscape delineation (boulder or timber guardrail) to keep cars off landscaped areas; one representative suggested an 18-inch timber guardrail behind the curb. A staff member noted the current plan showed roughly 23% landscaped area and asked for more robust plantings and delineation across the site.

On wetlands, applicant counsel said Dutchess County would not claim jurisdiction and that the disturbance is subject to town wetland permitting; staff confirmed the town wetland permit application would be considered with the board's resolution. The board also reviewed traffic consultant comments about whether large auto-haulers can make required K-turns on-site and recommended a dimensioned drive-aisle callout and a hatched loading area so carriers would not need to stage on Route 9.

After the adjustments were discussed and staff indicated they could draft a negative declaration for the board's consideration, a motion to authorize the planner to draft that declaration was made, seconded and approved by voice vote. The board confirmed the project had previously held a public hearing and agreed to return the item to the agenda for final sign-off after the required revisions and, if applicable, ZBA action on variances.