Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears first reading of electric-motorcycle ordinance to restrict sidewalk and trail use
Summary
City staff presented a first reading of Ordinance No. 2,839 that would define and regulate electric motorcycles in Enumclaw, prohibit their use on sidewalks and trails unless authorized, set equipment and age requirements, and add enforcement options.
Enumclaw staff presented the first reading of Ordinance No. 2,839 on June 22, proposing a municipal code chapter to define and regulate electric motorcycles.
At the first reading by title, City Clerk Jessica (speaker 10) read the ordinance's title. The police chief (speaker 11), who delivered the staff report, said staff have received resident complaints about high-powered electric motorcycles and similar vehicles being operated on public streets, sidewalks and multi-use trails. “These vehicles are often marketed as recreational or off-road use devices, but are frequently operated on public streets, sidewalks, and multi use trails within city limits,” the chief said.
According to the staff report, Enumclaw’s municipal code does not currently distinguish electric motorcycles from e-bikes and mopeds. The proposed ordinance would establish a clear definition based on power output, speed capability and design; restrict use areas; prohibit operation on sidewalks, parks and multi-use trails unless specifically authorized; require compliance with applicable vehicle laws; require helmets and lighting consistent with state law; and set operator requirements including a valid driver’s license and age restrictions where appropriate. The ordinance would also create enforcement options including warnings, citations, vehicle impoundment and misdemeanor classifications for repeat or egregious violations.
Staff cited recent state legislation requiring a Department of Licensing working group on electric-motorcycle regulation and a working deadline in October 2027. The staff report said the city attorney reviewed the proposed language to ensure consistency with applicable state statutes and that the public safety committee approved the draft for council consideration.
This was a first reading by title; council did not vote to adopt the ordinance at the June 22 meeting. The staff recommended the council continue to a second reading where councilmembers can propose amendments before any adoption vote.
