Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Adaptive Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Presenters explain adaptive management approach; say HCP monitoring will be evaluated with federal services and publicly reported

Forestry Department · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A presenter reviewed adaptive management concepts and explained that Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) adaptive management is prescriptive and closely coordinated with the HCP administrator and federal services; the presenter asked committee members for feedback on reporting and monitoring tools.

A presenter introduced adaptive management concepts and said adaptive management should be thought of as "learning by doing," noting the term covers a range of processes and that different supporting documents have different adaptive management requirements.

The presenter said chapter 4 of the draft plan includes new guidance on decision authority and vision—"who has the eventual, like, the power to change things and what the process is"—and that the flavor of adaptive management will vary across topics.

On the HCP specifically, the presenter said HCP adaptive management is "the most detailed process" with the "least amount of decision space and least amount of input from SAC." The presenter described the typical cycle—assessment, implementation (including ITPs), monitoring, evaluation and adjustment—and said the evaluation and adjustment will mainly occur between the HCP administrator and the Federal Services, with monitoring information also provided as public reporting.

The presenter solicited feedback from committee members on where the committee should fit in and how the department should report monitoring outputs, saying the department is still figuring out the best way to present these monitoring components and invited examples of dashboards or online reporting tools.

Next steps: staff asked committee members to provide examples of online reporting systems and indicated the department will continue defining decision authority and reporting processes for adaptive management and HCP monitoring.