Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Merit System topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deputy law director outlines scope and legal limits of Knox County sheriff merit system
Summary
Myers Morton, deputy law director, told the Knox County Sheriff's Office Merit Board that most county employees are 'at will' while sheriff's office personnel are covered by a merit system that requires 'good cause' and due-process protections; he cited local ordinance sections, a state statute, and case law to illustrate the scope and limits of board authority.
Myers Morton, deputy law director, told the Knox County Sheriff's Office Merit Board that most county employees are employed "at will" but that the sheriff's office operates under a different standard: a merit system that restricts hiring, promotions, demotions, layoffs and terminations to "good reasons" and requires certain due-process protections. "We can be fired for any reason. We can be fired for no reason," Morton said, contrasting that status with merit-covered positions.
Morton walked members through the county ordinance adopting the merit system (referencing sections he read as 42-52 through 42-67 and noting reserved sections 42-68 through 42-85). He said the ordinance and accompanying board policies are intended to make service in classified sheriff's-office positions "based on merit and fitness and free from personal bias and political consideration." He pointed members to written policies and materials available on the county website.
Turning to case law and statutory guidance, Morton cited Moss v. Shelby County and quoted a passage the court used to define "cause": "The term cause implies good cause, which must be substantial...some substantial shortcoming which renders continuance in the office or employment...detrimental to the discipline and efficiency of the service." He told the board that courts and state law provide the working definition of "just cause" used when employment actions are contested.
Morton summarized the legislative history the board should know: a 1970 private act created a Knox County merit system for sheriff employees; the County Sheriff's Civil Service Law of 1974 extended merit systems statewide; and the county's later charter adoption (around 1990) altered how Knox County incorporated state law. He also handed out a copy of the statute as read in the meeting (transcript citation: "Tennessee Code Annotated 8 8 4 1 9") and noted that the state law includes a mandatory provision restricting political activity by classified employees.
He reviewed the ordinance's coverage rules and powers, saying the classified service applies to "all positions and all employees of the sheriff's office except for the sheriff and up to 10 additional appointed positions at his or her discretion" (the transcript notes this previously had been seven, and has been increased to ten). Morton also listed categories the ordinance excludes from classification (for example, employees whose income derives from court fees and certain court officers) and pointed to an exhibit letter from Judge Spangler listing seven positions not covered.
Morton reminded board members that Knox County requires all appointees to follow the county code of ethics and recommended that members review the county ethics materials and the accompanying seminar. He then invited questions; the chair thanked Morton and asked that the presentation materials be made available to board members for review.
No formal action was taken on policy changes during the meeting; Morton provided the legal context and the board moved on to routine approvals later in the agenda.
