Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Task force members warn MDAs can lock in decades of development; plan Deering Park tour and PUD review
Summary
Members raised repeated concerns that master development agreements (MDAs) and long PUD terms can become perpetual and cited Venetian Bay as an example; the task force will attend an April 10 Deering Park site tour and follow a March 25 workshop before preparing talking points for commissioners.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the task force spent much of the meeting discussing Deering Park planning, PUD timing and the limits of master development agreements.
A Committee member urged the task force to study the package to be presented to commissioners and said the group should be ready to explain the details at the next meeting. The Chair noted a Deering Park site tour is planned on April 10 to view representative mixed-use and light-industrial projects, and members said material from a March 25 workshop and the PUD first and second readings will inform their comments.
Several members criticized long-running MDAs and recommended contract language changes. "That MDA had the following in it... once he build something on it, it's into perpetuity," a Committee member said, citing examples including Venetian Bay and one MDA tied to a local Regency development. The member urged limiting MDA terms, adding end dates and making contractual obligations explicit (for example, changing discretionary language to 'shall' where appropriate).
The group discussed mechanisms to reduce long-term risk from developer-initiated modifications, including shorter MDA durations, clearer performance milestones tied to approvals, and bringing more MDAs to the full commission for review. Members also noted infrastructure dependencies — for example, concerns that the 4495 interchange and other roadway improvements would be required for some projects to move forward.
Why it matters: Task force members said learning lessons from past projects and tightening agreements now could reduce future unintended outcomes, protect stormwater and conservation areas and keep more oversight with elected officials.
No formal motions or votes on changes to the comp plan or MDAs were taken at the meeting. The task force agreed to review updated materials after the April 10 tour and the March 25 workshop and prepare talking points for the April commission meeting.
