Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Krebs council approves ordinances, permits and routine items
Summary
At the Dec. 17 meeting the council approved multiple ordinances (24-7, 24-8, 24-9) and emergency clauses, approved a building permit at 89 SW 6th, adopted Resolution 24-04 setting election dates, approved copier service, amended the holiday schedule, and tabled procurement statute adoption and a dam contract.
The Krebs City Council on Dec. 17 approved several routine and ordinance items and took formal votes summarized here.
What the council approved - Ordinance 24-7 (rezoning Block 202 Lots 6–9 from C-1 to R-1) — motion passed unanimously; emergency clause adopted. - Ordinance 24-8 (closure of an alley in Block 20) — motion passed unanimously; emergency clause adopted. - Ordinance 24-9 (amending the employee retirement defined-benefit plan) — motion passed unanimously; emergency clause adopted. - Resolution 24-04 (notice of election for Wards Two and Four and election filing dates) — approved unanimously. - Building permit for construction at 89 SW 6th (Block 47 Lot 6) — approved unanimously. - Copier service contract with Miller Office Equipment (two machines) — approved. - Amendment to the 2025 holiday schedule (Martin Luther King Jr. Day moved to Jan. 20) — approved. - Motion to table adoption of purchasing statutes from the 'Purchasing Handbook for Oklahoma Counties' until counsel is present — passed (David Bailey voted no; motion passed). - Motion to table consideration of the dam repair contract with CACY Wood Construction pending three bids and legal review — passed unanimously. - Motion to adjourn to KUA — passed unanimously.
What was tabled or postponed - The contract to award CACY Wood Construction for dam repairs was tabled until three bids are provided and an attorney can advise. - Adoption of purchasing statutes was tabled until legal counsel is seated.
Votes listed above reflect roll-call votes taken at the Dec. 17 meeting; the council did not take action on zoning matters that a clerk identified as potentially unlawful pending attorney review.
