Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Legislation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Roeland Park council adopts 2026 state legislative priorities amid concerns over state preemption

Roeland Park City Council · February 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Roeland Park City Council unanimously approved its 2026 state legislative priorities after brief discussion, as the mayor warned recent state bills could limit local authority over taxes and elections. Council asked residents to contact legislators about proposed changes to municipal control.

The Roeland Park City Council voted to adopt its 2026 state legislative priorities during its Feb. 16 meeting.

Mayor Michael Popa said the priorities package reflects council input and flagged several bills moving through the state legislature that could affect local control. "SB 244...was vetoed by the governor on Friday, and it is more than likely being taken up" for a veto-override, Popa said, adding that other measures would move municipal elections to even years and limit use of local resources on ballot measures.

The mayor also summarized HB 2745, a tax-related bill that would cap valuation increases at 3% and—after amendment—requires a petition signed by 10% of voters in the last presidential election to trigger a ballot question if local government exceeds that cap. Popa said the change means the state has carved out a higher petition threshold than originally proposed.

City Administrator Keith Moody told the council he was concerned about an increase in state preemption bills. "Folks in Topeka are intent on diminishing local authority," he said, urging council members to encourage constituents to contact their legislators.

Council Member Hague moved to adopt the priorities, and Council Member Fadley seconded the motion. Mayor Popa called for a voice vote; the motion carried with the mayor announcing, "Ayes have it. Motion carries." The council did not amend the document at the meeting.