Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Program Sustainability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee probes Spark program sustainability and foster‑care impacts amid Medicaid uncertainty
Summary
Members asked whether Spark is billing Medicaid and whether the program reduces county foster‑care costs; staff said the FCTR service definition is not approved for Medicaid billing yet and suggested it may take additional years to show financial impacts on foster‑care placements.
Committee members asked whether Spark, a family‑centered treatment program the county supports, is billing Medicaid and whether it has reduced foster‑care placements or county spending. Dr. Katie Samuels said Spark is not billing Medicaid because the FCTR service definition has not been approved; she said the county is monitoring intervention impacts and that sample sizes to measure foster‑care reductions are small at present.
Committee member S9 asked whether the county will be able to sustain services if Medicaid does not cover them; participants noted Spark has served a small cohort (11 families mentioned in the presentation) and that impacts on county foster‑care dollars may take additional years to materialize. A county staff member suggested inviting Spark and other providers to an October or November meeting to provide an update on billing status and measurable outcomes.
