Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Intellectual Freedom topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oregon Library Association gives Siuslaw board a short primer on intellectual freedom

Siuslaw School District 97J Board of Directors · March 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Alyssa Donahoe of the Oregon Library Association delivered a condensed intellectual‑freedom training to the Siuslaw School District board, emphasizing legal standards for obscenity, the value of diverse collections, and practical guidance for librarians and board members.

Alyssa Donahoe, co‑chair of the Oregon Library Association’s Intellectual Freedom Committee, presented a 30‑minute overview to the Siuslaw School District 97J board on March 12, saying intellectual freedom ‘‘protects an individual's right to access, explore, consider, and express ideas’’ and that it is rooted in the First Amendment. She framed selection decisions around legal precedent (the Miller test for obscenity) and practical considerations for school libraries.

Donahoe told directors that obscenity under the Miller test requires an objective, three‑part showing and reminded the board that the test is applied to the oldest minors (17). She urged trustees to evaluate books as whole works rather than single passages and recommended relying on established vetting resources and an objective reconsideration process. "Not every book will be right for everyone, but every book is right for someone," she said, and offered the Oregon Library Association and sample OSBA policies as resources.

The presenter also discussed techniques librarians use to reduce personal bias in selection and how to apply the "windows, mirrors and sliding glass doors" framework to ensure library collections serve diverse student needs. She said parents retain rights to opt children out of instruction but cannot unilaterally remove books for the entire student body. Donahoe offered to share her slides and contact information for follow‑up training.

The training preceded a large public‑comment period and the board’s later policy discussion on supplemental materials and library reconsideration procedures; the superintendent organized the session at short notice.