Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Aesthetics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners press SRP on screening and aesthetics as part of Aurora Solar expansion
Summary
Commissioners expressed concern about visual impacts of the nearby solar arrays and a proposed 40-foot building, pressing SRP to commit to screening and to clarify building footprints even as staff said aesthetics will be enforced at site-plan review.
Get email alerts on the Aesthetics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several Florence commissioners raised aesthetics and mitigation as the commission considered SRP’s PUD amendment on July 16. Vice Chair DeRosa described the existing solar field seen from Attaway Road as "visual blight," saying nearby residents face an unacceptable view. Commissioners asked whether the town could require walls or other screening and whether the commission would retain any authority to weigh aesthetics.
SRP representatives acknowledged the concerns. "For the area that's in front of you tonight, we are working with the staff to make sure that those have walls and they're screened appropriately and consistent with town code," Rhys Anderson said. Community development staff and the applicant clarified that recent state law changes have shifted many discretionary aesthetic decisions to administrative staff during design review; the commission's role on this amendment was limited to the PUD boundary and the height modification. Commissioners warned they were reluctant to approve a higher height without seeing sample building designs, but the motion to continue for more information failed and the commission recommended approval with staff conditions.

