Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City staff outlines options and costs to replace aging water-meter software

Minnetrista City Council (work session) · July 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff told the Minnetrista City Council that the current proprietary meter-reading software will lose vendor support; staff outlined AMI and AMR options, estimated implementation and ongoing data fees, and said they will return in September or October with contract language and cost options.

City staff told the Minnetrista City Council that the city’s current proprietary water-meter reading software will no longer be supported and presented options to either update only the software or move to an AMI (continuous cellular/cloud) system that would require hardware upgrades on some meters.

A staff member said the implementation package included an initial implementation line item and recurring fees: “The implementation basically costs a total of $37,510,” the presenter said, adding that the first-year implementation amount of roughly $13,000 includes a cellular data fee and training. The staff member also cited an Itron annual startup fee of $5,250 and an AMI smart-start data package listed at $9,260 for year one, with a year-two baseline of about $9,073 if the city deploys the AMI devices staff described.

Council members raised questions about installation scope and customer impacts. Staff described a possible mass-install external-vendor option (the transcript referenced an approximate vendor-install total near $400,000 and per-install estimates in the mid-$40s), and said the AMI option includes a customer portal and a per-device cellular data charge that staff noted as $6.96 per device per year. On cybersecurity, a council member asked who controls and secures the cloud-based data; staff replied that local access would be limited to a single staff account and that the city can seek the vendor’s cybersecurity protocols before contracting.

The council discussed staged or targeted replacements: staff said the city could update only the software (an option staff estimated would require roughly $19,000 for training and implementation) without buying AMI end devices immediately, or pilot AMI on problem meters and maintain drive-by reads for most meters for many years. Staff told the council it would bring a proposed agreement and clearer cost options in September or October for council consideration.