Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Statutory Process topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Corporation Counsel: statute governs conference process; additional public hearing not required by statute

Danbury City Council · July 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Corporation Counsel told the council the statutory process requires the council (the appointing authority) to transmit recommendations to the Charter Revision Commission, which prepares a final report to return to the council; counsel said the statute does not explicitly require another public hearing.

Corporation Counsel told the City Council that the process for conferring with the Charter Revision Commission is governed by state statute and that the council, as the appointing authority, sends recommendations to the commission. Counsel said the commission prepares a final report and returns it to the council for review before the council prepares ballot questions. Counsel stated that the statute "does not call for another public hearing" and cited notice provisions in "section 1 2 25 of the general statute," adding that notices must comply with statutory requirements.

Counsel's explanation prompted follow-up questions from council members about who would chair a joint conference and how notices would be posted. Counsel recommended the council president open and conduct the joint conference in the absence of explicit statutory language on who presides at a conferring meeting between the appointing authority and the commission.