Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Standards Based Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
La Crosse School District leaders frame standards‑based shift as an equity move; teachers and parents press for clearer implementation
Summary
District presenters told a school‑board workshop that standards‑based learning reframes grading to focus on mastery and equity, while board members and parents pressed for stronger oversight, better interim reporting and clearer high‑school implementation plans.
District staff told a La Crosse School District workshop that the countywide move to standards‑based learning is intended to center student mastery and reduce inequitable grading practices.
"Standards‑based is an equity model that empowers the student," said Ruth barstead, identified in the presentation as the district literacy specialist, describing classrooms where retakes, feedback and clarified proficiency scales give students repeated opportunities to show learning. The district presenter said the approach emphasizes teaching and learning components more than simply changing grade labels: "this process has so much more to do with the standards based learning and the teaching component and maybe how we're measuring learning differently and much less about the grading," the presenter said.
Presenters outlined a multi‑year rollout that began in 2017, drew on teacher leaders and external conferences, and included summer institutes and department‑level coaching. They said the district will continue to use Canvas as its learning management system while migrating final summative grades to Skyward to provide families a clearer grade display.
Board members and parents responded with questions about implementation fidelity and transparency. Board member Adam asked, "what kind of oversight is there with the implementation of standard based grading?" prompting presenters to describe surveys, phased rollouts and additional training for teachers. A participant at the meeting reported that roughly 40% of teachers who participated in an earlier survey approved the initial rollout; presenters said that feedback prompted the district to pause, provide training and rephase elements of the implementation.
The workshop closed with board requests for follow‑up materials and a future workshop showing sample report cards and implementation checkpoints. Presenters left materials and resources for board review, including references to Ken O'Connor's grading resources and Marzano's implementation phases. The meeting adjourned after the board indicated it would continue monitoring implementation progress.
