Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Facilities director outlines $30M+ deferred projects and preventive‑maintenance gains in OE‑12 report
Summary
Facilities staff told the board the district manages 17 sites on 127 acres (~1.5 million sq ft), reported over 2,000 work orders last year (up ~1,000), and described deferred capital work that totals ~$19.6M without State Road or $30M+ including State Road; energy rebates and estimated annual savings were also highlighted.
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Facilities presenter Joe Lavina told the board the OE‑12 monitoring report includes a five‑year capital improvement plan, preventive‑maintenance schedules and condition assessments for all schools. "What does that mean? In La Crosse we have 17 sites on 127 acres and over 1.5 million square feet of building," Lavina said, using the building inventory to frame the scale of district facilities work.
Lavina told the board that projects taken offline previously amounted to about $19.6 million, and when State Road is included the deferrals rise to more than $30 million. He reviewed preventive‑maintenance contracts, condition‑assessment meetings with principals, and an increase in recorded work orders—over 2,000 in the latest year, roughly 1,000 more than the prior year—attributing part of the rise to improved reporting as well as increased workload. He also described energy rebates of about $144,000 and an estimated $136,000 in annual savings from recent energy projects, part of funds reinvested into additional projects.
Board members questioned scope and vendors (Johnson Controls and Complete Controls), project schedules and life‑cycle cost assumptions. The meeting included detailed discussion of solar projects, HVAC life‑cycle examples, safety assessments (annual vulnerability walks and the district 'Speak Up, Speak Out' report) and facility‑use metrics (44,000 community hours beyond the school day). The board later voted that the superintendent and district are in compliance with OE‑12 (motion passed by roll call).

