Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Monitoring Indicators topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates 'reasonable progress' language as it updates results monitoring indicators
Summary
Board members and staff debated proposed changes to results policy indicators (R3 series), weighing rigid year-over-year metrics against more flexible cohort or growth-based measures; administration proposed edits to allow multiple ways to demonstrate reasonable progress.
The board discussed recommended edits to results monitoring indicators (R3 series) designed to move away from strict year-over-year percentage comparisons toward measures that recognize both growth and achievement. Several members expressed concern that flexible language could be too subjective; one member referred to the more subjective phrasing as "squishy." Dr Engel and Mr Fite described the administrative rationale: the board needs latitude to identify "reasonable progress" in a variety of ways, including cohort pre/post assessment, measures of student growth and contextual indicators for historically marginalized groups.
Members suggested concrete ways to balance flexibility with rigor — for example, using within-cohort pre/post assessments that let teachers show student growth during the year instead of comparing different cohorts across years. The board did not adopt final indicator language at the meeting; administration will place recommended changes on a future action agenda for formal vote.
