Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Manhole Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shamrock Lakes board approves contractor to replace three manhole covers

Shamrock Lakes Town Board · July 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Town Board approved a single contractor, Cicero Underground, to replace three manhole covers—one under asphalt and two in yards—accepting a full-project estimate and preferring a single-contractor approach to avoid coordination problems.

The Shamrock Lakes Town Board voted July 17 to hire Cicero (Cisero/Cicero Underground in the estimate) to replace three manhole covers, including one buried under asphalt that requires excavation and resurfacing.

Board members reviewed competing estimates and the practical difficulty of splitting the job between contractors. A board member summarized the recommendation: "I kind of like the idea of one company doing the whole [scheme]... keep it under one contractor and go from there." Kelly moved to approve Cicero’s estimate to do all three manhole covers for $33,650 from the sewer account; the motion was seconded and the board voted in favor.

During discussion staff warned that the buried cover could be between six inches and four feet below asphalt, creating uncertainty in final labor and concrete/asphalt work. Diane said she requested an itemized estimate from Cicero to compare costs for the two smaller yard covers versus the one in the road. The board agreed that keeping the whole job with one contractor reduces coordination risk and potential extra mobilization costs.

The board instructed staff to direct the contractor to update the invoice name to Shamrock Lakes and to proceed with ordering the work once administrative details are confirmed. The meeting record did not include a roll-call vote with member names; the board recorded the voice vote as "motion carries."